Best 1440p monitor under 300
2022 update: Best 1440p monitor under 300 - choosing the best gaming monitor
Sharpening “technologies” (Super Sharpness, VividPixel, Clarity) often turn out to be useless, they work very roughly and negatively affect the elaboration of fine details. Various systems a la Low Blue Light that reduce the blue component of the spectrum also turn out to be quite useless (but not for everyone).
Acer Nitro XV272 (Pbmiiprzx) is the most affordable gaming IPS
Budget IPS Acer XV272 costs about $300. It’s worth noting that you shouldn’t expect the level of the more expensive XB271 in terms of image quality, but this Full HD 144 Hz monitor with FreeSync / G-Sync Compatible will complement almost any video card well, up to the new Radeon RX 5600XT or GeForce RTX 2060. It is worth bearing in mind that that this https://thetimes.digital/games/best-gaming-monitor-under-300/ does not support the simultaneous use of FreeSync and the declared HDR 400.
AOC C24G1 - smaller and cheaper
The most affordable option in our selection (about $200) is suitable for those who have finally decided to replace their old office TN-ku with a gaming model with a frequency of 144 Hz, but are not ready to spend a lot of money. It is worth bearing in mind that this is a budget monitor in every sense: users complain about a rather high percentage of defects, poor calibration out of the box and uneven backlighting.
ASUS ROG Swift PG258Q - for eSports
25 inches, Full HD, TN, from $300. This is a professional esports monitor that will hardly satisfy the average user. But for those who care about a response speed of 1ms at 240Hz with native G-Sync support, the rest of the parameters fade into the background.
ASUS ROG Swift PG27UQ is expensive and without compromise
The Swift PG27UQ is more of a concept than a monitor for real users. Only the GeForce RTX 2080 Ti, and preferably two, is capable of fully revealing the capabilities of a 4K HDR IPS matrix with dot dynamic backlighting, a frequency of 144 Hz and G-Sync. However, you wouldn't expect anything less from a computer of a person who buys a monitor for more than $2000.
In order to attract buyers to their models, manufacturers hang "a ton of labels", painting in colors the advantages of certain software technologies, often only spoiling the final image on the screen.
When choosing, you should not focus on dozens of pre-installed modes for games of different genres. Two, maximum three (including the default one) of them will be enough for you, and to make the most important changes to increase the likelihood of winning the next battle, functions such as “black stabilizer” (to change visibility in deep shadows) during manual adjustment will help you make the most important changes.
Super Sharpness, VividPixel, Clarity
Sharpening “technologies” (Super Sharpness, VividPixel, Clarity) often turn out to be useless, they work very roughly and negatively affect the elaboration of fine details. Various systems a la Low Blue Light that reduce the blue component of the spectrum also turn out to be quite useless (but not for everyone). In the course of their work, the brightness of the backlight decreases, the color temperature drops to the level of 4000-5500 K, the set gamma curves change in order to reduce the contrast of the image. Such global changes in the image on the screen sometimes lead to confusion and do not leave the desire to stop at a similar color mode. In addition, if you continue to sit at the monitor without taking full breaks in work, then no additional presets will definitely help you - your eyes and head will continue to hurt.
Gaming computers and monitors: see Wikipedia